Журнал: Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология:4М)

Быков А. В.
Метод факторных виньеток и шкала самооценки альтруизма: сравнение онлайн- и офлайн-опросов

Быков Андрей Вячеславович
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»

Полный текст

Ссылка при цитировании:

Рубрика:

Выражение признательности

Аннотация:

Ключевые слова:

Литература:

• Rushton J.P., Chrisjohn R.D., Fekken G.C. The Altruistic Personality and the Self- Report Altruism Scale // Personality and Individual Differences.1981. No. 2. P. 293–302.
• Meeker M., Wu L. Internet Trends Report. Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers. http://www.kpcb.com/insights/2013-internet-trends (date of access: 01.12.2014).
• Fricker R.D. Sampling Methods for Web and E-mail Surveys // The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods / Ed. N. Fielding, R.M. Lee, G. Blank. L.: SAGE, 2008. P. 195–216.
• Worthy M. and Mayclin D. A Comparison of Data Quality Across Modes in a Mixed-mode Collection of Administrative Records // Survey Practice. 2013. No. 6. P. 1–6.
• Wang S., Jiao H., Young M. J., Brooks T., Olson J. Comparability of Computer-based and Paper-and-pencil Testing in K-12 Reading Assessments: A Meta-analysis of Testing Mode Effects // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2008. No. 68. P. 5–24.
• Gravlee C.C., Bernard H. R., Maxwell C.R., Jacobsohn A. Mode Effects in Free-list Elicitation: Comparing Oral, Written, and Web-based Data Collection // Social Science Computer Review. 2013. No. 31. P. 119–132.
• Kleck G., Roberts K. What Survey Modes are Most Effective in Eliciting Self-reports of Criminal or Delinquent Behavior? // Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences / Ed. L. Gideon. N.Y.: Springer, 2012. P. 417–439.
• Rossi P., Anderson A. The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction // Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach / Ed. P. Rossi, S. Nock. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1982.
• Sniderman P.M., Grob D. Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys // Annual Review of Sociology. 1996. No. 22. P. 377–399.
• Briggs S.R., Cheek J.M. The Role of Factor Analysis in the Development and Evaluation of Personality Scales // Journal of Personality. 1986. No. 54. P. 106–148.
• Stolte J.F. The Context of Satisficing in Vignette Research // Journal of Social Psychology. 1994. No. 134. P. 727–733.
• Alexander C.S., Becker H.J. The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1978. No. 42. P. 93–104.
• Finch J. The Vignette Technique in Survey Research // Sociology. 1978. No. 21. P. 105–114
• Девятко И.Ф. В сторону справедливости: экспериментальное исследование взаимосвязи между дескриптивным обыденным знанием и восприятием дистрибутивной справедливости // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2011. № 2 (55). С. 139–164.
• Sergi M.J., Fiske A.P., Horan W.P., Kern R.S., Kee K.S., Subotnik K.L., Nuechterlein K.H., Green M.F. Development of a Measure of Relationship Perception in Schizophrenia // Psychiatry Research. 2009. No. 16. P. 54–62.
• Steinert T., Lepping P. Legal Provisions and Practice in the Management of Violent Patients. A Case Vignette Study in 16 European Countries // European Psychiatry. 2009. No. 24. P. 135–141.
• Knobe J., Buckwalter W., Nichols S., Robbins P., Sarkissian H., Sommers T. Experimental Philosophy // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012. No. 63. P. 81–99.
• Wallander L. 25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review // Social Science Research. 2009. No. 38. P. 505–520.
• Thurman. Q.C., Lam J.A., Rossi P.H. Sorting out the cuckoo’s nest: A Factorial Survey Approach to the Study of Popular Conceptions of Mental Illness // The Sociological Quarterly. 1988. No. 29. P. 565–588.
• Судьин С.А. Метод виньеток в исследовании обыденных представлений о психических болезнях // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н.И. Лобачевского. Серия социальные науки. 2013. № 1 (29). С. 53–59.
• Девятко И.Ф. Причинность в обыденном сознании и в социологическом объяснении: контуры нового исследовательского подхода // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование. 2007. № 25. С. 5–21.
• Dulmer H. Experimental Plans in Factorial Surveys: Random or Quota Design. Sociological Methods and Research. 2007. No. 35. P. 482-409.
• Caro F.G., Ho T., McFadden D., Gottlieb A.S., Yee C., Chan T., Winter J. Using the Internet to Administer More Realistic Vignette Experiments // Social Science Computer Review. 2012. No. 30. P. 184–201.
• Некрасов С.И. Сравнение результатов онлайн- и оффлайн-опросов (на примере анкет разной сложности) // Социология: 4М. 2011. № 32. С. 53–74.
• Riva G., Teruzzi T., Anolli L. The Use of the Internet in Psychological Research: Comparison of Online and Offline Questionnaires // Cyber Psychology and Behavior. 2003. No. 6. P. 73–80.
• Gosling S. D., Vazire S., Srivastava S., John, O. P. Should we trust Web-based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions about Internet Questionnaires // American Psychologist. 2004. No. 59. P. 93–104.
• Herrero J., Meneses, J. Short Web-based Versions of the Perceived Stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scales: A Comparison to Pencil and Paper Responses Among Internet Users // Computers in Human Behavior. 2006. No. 22. P. 830–846.
• Weigold A., Weigold I.K., Russel E.J. Examination of the Equivalence of Self-report Survey-based Paper-and-pencil and Internet Data Collection Methods // Psychological Methods. 2013. No. 18. P. 53–70.
• Naus M.J., Philipp L.M., Samsi M. From Paper to Pixels: A Comparison of Paper and Computer Formats in Psychological Assessment // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. No. 25. P. 1–7.
• Otto P.E., Bolle F. Multiple Facets of Altruism and Their Influence on Blood Donation // The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2011. No. 40. P. 558–563.
• Preckel F., Thiemann H. Online- versus Paper-pencil-version of a High Potential Intelligence Test // Swiss Journal of Psychology. 2003. No. 62. P. 131–138.
• De Beuckelaer A., Lievens F. Measurement Equivalence of Paper-and-pencil and Internet Organisational Surveys: A Large Scale Examination in 16 Countries // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2009. No. 58. P. 336–361.
• Hardre P.L., Crowson H.M., Xie K. Examining Contexts-of-use for Web-based and Paper-based Questionnaires // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2012. No. 72. P. 115–138.
• Lewis I.M., Watson B.C., White K. M. Internet versus Paper-and-pencil Survey Methods in Psychological Experiments: Equivalence Testing of Participant Responses to Health-related Messages // Australian Journal of Psychology. 2009. No. 61. P. 107–116.

Сведения об авторах

Содержание выпуска

>> Содержание выпуска 2014. Том. 0. № 39.

>> Архив журнала