Anikin V., Lezhnina Y., Mareeva S., Tikhonovа N. Social Stratification by Life Chances: Evidence from Russia. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Sociology. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 80 ... Anikin V., Lezhnina Y., Mareeva S., Tikhonovа N. Social Stratification by Life Chances: Evidence from Russia. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Sociology. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 80/SOC/2017, 26 p.DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16315.72489Размещена на сайте: 28.03.18Текст на сайте НИУ-ВШЭ URL: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share//direct/213507230 (дата обращения 28.03.2018)Ссылка при цитировании:Anikin V., Lezhnina Y., Mareeva S., Tikhonovа N. Social Stratification by Life Chances: Evidence from Russia. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Sociology. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 80/SOC/2017, 26 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16315.72489.Anikin V., Lezhnina Y., Mareeva S., Tikhonovа N. Social Stratification by Life Chances: Evidence from Russia. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Sociology. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 80/SOC/2017, 26 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16315.72489.Авторы:Аникин В.А., Лежнина Ю.П., Мареева С.В., Тихонова Н.Е.АннотацияThe present paper operationalizes one of the oldest concepts in the sociological literature about social stratification. Relying on Weber’s theory, the authors consider life chances in terms of positive and negative privileges. This framework is fertile ground for constructing a series of indices measuring opportunities and risks in key areas of life such as economic conditions, work situation, human capital accumulation, and consumption and leisure activities. Drawing on empirical data from three 2015 representative Russian surveys, the authors classified the Russian population on a continuum of life chances. The majority of Russians obtain just one third of the maximum scores on the life-chance scale. It is also shown that the life-chance scale has a strong correlation with the peaks of income distribution; however, the relationship between lower- and middle-income groups are not that salient. Finally, we show that life chances are uniquely distributed across different localities in contemporary Russia. We admit therefore the high analytical power of the neo-Weberian concept of life chances in stratification studies. Measured via a multidimensional index, life chances appear a good alternative to a gradational approach and the relational stratification schema developed particularly for the working populationКлючевые слова: социальная стратификация life chances social risks positive and negative privileges social structure and stratification inequality russia Рубрики: Социальная структура и стратификацияЭкономическая социологияВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Тихонова Н. Е., Лежнина Ю. П., Мареева С. В., Аникин В. А., Каравай А. В., Слободенюк Е. Д.Модель доходной стратификации российского общества: динамика, факторы, межстрановые сравнения / Н. Е. Тихонова, Ю. П. Лежнина, С. В. Мареева, В. А. Аникин, А. В. Каравай, Е. Д. Слободенюк; под редакцией доктора социологических наук Н. Е. Тихоновой. — М. ; СПб. : Нестор- История, 2018. — 368 с. Anikin V., Lezhnina Yu., Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E., Tikhonova N. Income Stratification: Key Approaches and Their Application to Russia. Working Papers. Series: Public and Social Policy. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 02/PSP/2016, 36 p.The Middle Income Group in China and Russia. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. / Eds. by P. Li, M.K. Gorshkov. Singapore: Springer, 2021. - 373 p.Среднедоходные слои в России и Китае: положение, динамика, особенности мировоззрения / [М.К. Горшков и др.]; под ред. М.К. Горшкова, Ли Пэйлиня, П.М. Козыревой, Н.Е. Тихоновой. – М.: Новый хронограф, 2018. – 544 с.Tikhonova N. Typical Views, Attitudes and Self-Identifications in Principal Strata of Today’s Russian Society. Social Sciences, 2020, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 25-45.