On the relationships between the geopolitics and social ecology in the digital age [Электронный ресурс]

Текст статьи.

Ссылка при цитировании:

Аннотация

Drawing on the studies of works of the sociologists and politicians analyzing modern geopolitical trends and issues and on his own investigations in the realm of global environmental politics, the author put forward the following hypotheses. First, the coming of the Internet Galaxy and the rapid development of distance (astronomic) technical instruments of permanent observations on the global processes means that humanity become an inseparable part of cosmic ecosystem. Second, this supra-global ecosystem consists of the simultaneously competing and mutually interdependent political agents of various scale and political power. Third, the hierarchy within this supra-global ecosystem is conditioned by a space-time dimension of a particular geopolitical system, its energy potential and its impact on the earth geopolitical structures and processes. Fourth, the earth as a certain geopolitical system is exposed to both natural and social impacts from the outside and within. Fifth, this geopolitical system is subjected to the double impact: of cosmic influence and of competing political and economic subjects acted in the frames of the complex entity that consists of the cosmic, terrestrial and underground forces. Sixth, at the same time every particular ecosystem should have a permanent input of energy and resources for its reproduction as well as the governing institutions to maintain its relative integrity. Seventh, at the same time in the frame of earth surface the competing ecosystems have to maintain balance between their interests and the carrying capacity of the Biosphere. Eighth, if such balance is violated the competing ecosystems will be totally destroyed by the Biosphere collapse, and humanity will disappear or will fall in a dispersed and chaotically moving of isolated communities. Ninth, modern geopolitics is the Janus-like. In relation to the cosmic impact it has mainly defensive character, while in relation to the earth actors it has mainly offensive character aimed at domination on other social actors. Tenth, the humanity is needed in a mobile global institution capable to prevent such catastrophic events like a nuclear winter and other disastrous state of affairs.

_____________
Рецензия: Рекомендую для публикации на сайте.
к.с.н., рук. центра теоретических и историко-социологических исследований ИС РАН,
Данилова Е.Н.

Ключевые слова:

Рубрики:

Возможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:

• Oleg N. Yanitsky. On the Actuality of the Tempo-Rhythms Research. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology (IJRSA), vol 4, no. 2, 2018, pp. 31-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-8677.0402004.
• Yanitsky, O. The Ecological Wars: The Notion, Concept And Dynamics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2020, Vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 477-488.
• Yanitsky Oleg. The SBT-systems and its Technosphere: A Synopsis [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ИС РАН, 2016. С. 1-7. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4562
• Yanitsky O.N. New Critical Phase of Current Globalization [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ФНИСЦ РАН. – 2020. – 7 стр. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=7866
• Oleg N. Yanitsky. Metabolism as a master frame for globalization analysis [Электронный ресурс] // Официальный портал ИС РАН. – 2017. – 9 стр. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4930