Zhelnina, A. 2018. James M. Jasper and Jan Willem Duyvendak, eds. Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. 10, 3 (Dec. 2018), 106-109. Zhelnina, A. 2018. James M. Jasper and Jan Willem Duyvendak, eds. Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. 10, 3 (Dec. 2018), 106-109.ISSN 2076-8214DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-3-106-109РИНЦ: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37622665Размещена на сайте: 09.09.19Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: http://soclabo.org/index.php/laboratorium/article/view/828 (дата обращения 09.09.2019)Ссылка при цитировании:Zhelnina, A. 2018. James M. Jasper and Jan Willem Duyvendak, eds. Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. 10, 3 (Dec. 2018), 106-109. DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-3-106-109.Zhelnina, A. 2018. James M. Jasper and Jan Willem Duyvendak, eds. Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015. Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research. 10, 3 (Dec. 2018), 106-109. DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2018-10-3-106-109.Авторы:Желнина А.А.АннотацияPlayers and Arenas aims at promoting the strategic interaction perspective (SIP)—a theoretical effort to bridge the gap between the structural paradigm and cultural theories in political sociology and social movements studies. Structural approaches seek to establish causal links between relatively stable factors (features of the political and economic environment) and a movement’s emergence and success. The most influential of the structural approaches is political process theory, with its core concept of political opportunity (McAdam, McCarthy, and Zald 1996). Cultural theories call for more attention to emotions, morality, and choices made by protestors, claiming that these can help protesters recognize and create political opportunities for their movement’s development, thus allowing for more agency of movement actors.Ключевые слова: the cultural theory political sociology social movements protest structural dimension культурная теория политическая социология социальные движения протест структурные изменения Рубрики: Социология пространства и городаПолитическая теорияВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Мирясова О. А.Гражданская субъектность как предпосылка формирования политического поля // Политическая наука. 2018. № 2. С. 214-233.Yanitsky O.N. On Transition to Postmodernity and the Role of an «Ideal City» Modeling. International Journal of Political Science (IJPS), 2018, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 49-56.Tykanova, E., Khokhlova, A. Grassroots Urban Protests in St. Petersburg: (Non-)Participation in Decision-Making About the Futures of City Territories. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 2019, pp. 1-22.Тыканова Е. В., Желнина А. А.«Игроки» на «аренах»: анализ взаимодействий в городских локальных конфликтах (случай Санкт-Петербурга и Москвы) // Журнал исследований социальной политики. 2021. № 19(2). С. 205-222.Павлова Т. В.Политическое представительство // Массовая политика: институциональные основания / под ред. С.В. Патрушева.- М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2016. С. 87-97.