Oleg N. Yanitsky. Russian Mega-Cities: Some Current Structural-Functional Trends. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology (IJRSA), vol 5, no. 4, 2019, pp. 33-40. doi: http: ... Oleg N. Yanitsky. Russian Mega-Cities: Some Current Structural-Functional Trends. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology (IJRSA), vol 5, no. 4, 2019, pp. 33-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-8677.0504004.ISSN 2454-8677DOI: 10.20431/2454-8677.0504004Размещена на сайте: 25.11.19Текст статьи на сайте журнала URL: https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijrsa/v5-i4/4.pdf (дата обращения 25.11.2019)Ссылка при цитировании:Oleg N. Yanitsky. Russian Mega-Cities: Some Current Structural-Functional Trends. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology (IJRSA), vol 5, no. 4, 2019, pp. 33-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-8677.0504004. DOI: 10.20431/2454-8677.0504004.Oleg N. Yanitsky. Russian Mega-Cities: Some Current Structural-Functional Trends. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Anthropology (IJRSA), vol 5, no. 4, 2019, pp. 33-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-8677.0504004. DOI: 10.20431/2454-8677.0504004.Авторы:Яницкий О.Н.АннотацияThe article analyzes the current trends and issues of the Russian mega-cities, and their relationships with a close and remote periphery. These cities are simultaneously concentrating a huge productive, scientific, political and cultural potential and worsening the situation of their close and remote periphery. The use of information technologies and networks accelerate the development of the mega-cities whereas their periphery gradually lags behind. The external appearance of the mega-city is changing very slowly, while a functional organization of these cities is changing permanently. The further the more the majority of the mega-cities’ population considers them as a start-up for their carrier or as a jumping-off place for an emigration. A habitat structure of the above cities is changing as well: the estates of the rich are planned to situate in the central parts of the mega-cities while the majority of the poor will be gradually resettled to the periphery of the mega-cities. The estates of the rich will have their own gardens and all other necessary facilities whereas for the rest of the mega-cities residents the parks of a common use are planned. In sum, all residents of the mega-cities are socially and spatially disconnected, and their life is under double pressure: their structural-functional organization is permanently accelerated and transformed. Ключевые слова: center vs. periphery globalization information processes mega-cities networks residents structural-functional organization urban planning russia Оглавлениескрыть оглавлениепоказать оглавление Рубрики: Социология пространства и городаСоциология риска и катастрофВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Yanitsky O.N. Russian Megalopolis: Processes of Divergence, Separation and Integration of its Agents. International Journal of Political Science (IJPS), 2018, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 5-13.Yanitsky, O.N. (2017). Current Globalization: A Challenge For The Humanities. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(12) 131-140.Usacheva O. Civilian Mobilization Networks // Sociological Research, Vol. 53, No. 2 (2014), p. 3-17.Yanitsky, O. N. (2017). In memoriam of Raymond Pahl Whose modern megalopolises? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16) 109-117.Yanitsky O.N. On Transition to Postmodernity and the Role of an «Ideal City» Modeling. International Journal of Political Science (IJPS), 2018, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 49-56.