Tikhonova N. Typical Views, Attitudes and Self-Identifications in Principal Strata of Today’s Russian Society. Social Sciences, 2020, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 25-45. Tikhonova N. Typical Views, Attitudes and Self-Identifications in Principal Strata of Today’s Russian Society. Social Sciences, 2020, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 25-45.ISSN 0134-5486DOI: 10.21557/SSC.60231515Размещена на сайте: 28.10.20 Поискать полный текст на Google AcademiaСсылка при цитировании:Tikhonova N. Typical Views, Attitudes and Self-Identifications in Principal Strata of Today’s Russian Society. Social Sciences, 2020, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 25-45. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.60231515.Tikhonova N. Typical Views, Attitudes and Self-Identifications in Principal Strata of Today’s Russian Society. Social Sciences, 2020, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 25-45. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.60231515.Авторы:Тихонова Н.Е.АннотацияIn this article, I analyze typical views, attitudes and selfidentifications in the three principal strata of today’s Russian society from the perspective of Max Weber’s theory of positive and negative life chances. By analyzing the returns of two national surveys carried out by the Federal Sociological Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2015 and 2018, I demonstrate that these strata differ from each other not only in terms of occupational structure and living and education standards but also in terms of their members’ typical self-identifications, sets of principles and values, and views on the current situation in Russia. While the lower and middle strata are relatively similar to each other, the upper stratum, which accounts for about 20% of the population, stands out with its majority’s specific self-identifications, planning horizons, nonconformism and internal locus of control. Most upper-stratum members have greater ambitions and are more optimistic about the general situation in Russia than the rest of the population. The upper stratum also puts distinctive expectations on the state—it mainly wants the state to ensure a scientific and technological breakthrough for the country. Social solidarity is rarer while the stigmatization of the poor is more common in this stratum than in the other two strata. The upper stratum’s principles and values manifest themselves in the behavioral strategies of its members. I come to the conclusion that dividing Russian society into these three strata meets principal neo-Weberian criteria of class and that, within the limits of this social structure model, the upper stratum with its objective and subjective characteristics can be seen as the middle class.Ключевые слова: social stratification social structure life chances stratification model stratum strata social reproduction self-identifications social status Рубрики: Социальная структура и стратификацияСоциология личностиВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Anikin V., Lezhnina Y., Mareeva S., Tikhonovа N. Social Stratification by Life Chances: Evidence from Russia. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Sociology. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 80/SOC/2017, 26 p.Tikhonova N.E. Income Stratification in Russia in Comparison with Other Countries // Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 18-34.Anikin V., Lezhnina Yu., Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E., Tikhonova N. Income Stratification: Key Approaches and Their Application to Russia. Working Papers. Series: Public and Social Policy. National research university Higher shcool of economics. WP BRP 02/PSP/2016, 36 p.Тихонова Н. Е.Особенности идентичностей и мировоззрения основных страт современного российского общества // Мир России. 2020. Т. 29. № 1. С. 6–30.Тихонова Н. Е.Tikhonova N.E. The Middle Class in Russian Society: Homogeneity or Heterogeneity? // Handbook on Social Stratification in the BRIC Countries. Change and Perspective / Еdited by: Peilin Li (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China), M.K. Gorshkov (Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia), Celi Scalon (Brazilian Sociological Society, Brazil), K.L. Sharma (Jaipur National University, India) // World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 2013, p. 359-377.