Anikin V.A. Mode of Socio-Economic Development and Occupational Structure: The Case of Contemporary Russia Аникин В.А.Anikin V.A. Mode of Socio-Economic Development and Occupational Structure: The Case of Contemporary Russia // Transition Studies Review. 2013. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 397-415.ISSN 1614-4007Размещена на сайте: 22.11.14Текст статьи.Ссылка при цитировании:Аникин В.А. Anikin V.A. Mode of Socio-Economic Development and Occupational Structure: The Case of Contemporary Russia // Transition Studies Review. 2013. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 397-415.АннотацияThe given paper assumes the existence of a correlation between the occupational structure and the mode of social and economic development of a country. It is shown that the modern stage of development in advanced economies could be described by the post-industrial phase with (a) the specific proportions in the occupational structure (predominance of professional managers and technical experts); (b) particular nature of work and the corresponding extent of labor division according to specialization and qualification (highly skilled labor with broad spe- cialization and a new criterion of creativity included within qualifications). Within the certain historical framework these indicators, combined onto the entire scheme, produce the criteria to distinct different types of socio-economic development and arrange them in consistent order. The analysis of occupational structure of Russian population shows that the reforms of 1990s have facilitated the process of dein- dustrialization alongside with the growth of semi- and low-skilled jobs. According to the scheme, Russia seems to have reached the stage of the development that is similar to one of the 1950–1960s in the USA and the Europe.Ключевые слова: economic and social development occupational stratification labour potential industrialization Рубрики: Социология профессий и профессиональных группСоциальная структура и стратификацияВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Anikin V.A., Tikhonova N.E. Poverty and Inequality in BRICS Countries. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 5. P. 305-341.Epikhina Y. The scale and dynamics of employment precarity in Russian society from 1998 to 2015 In: Nikula, J. (Ed.), Chernysh, M. (Ed.). (2020). Social Distinctions in Contemporary Russia. London: Routledge. P. 65-83.Попова Р. И., Токсанбаева М. С.Характеристики занятости в условиях постиндустриализации и деиндустриализации // Бизнес. Образование. Право. 2022. № 4 (61). С. 98-104.Каравай А. В.Состояние и динамика качества человеческого капитала российских рабочих // TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2017. Т. 15. № 3. С. 144-158.Стрельникова А. В.Роль культурного ландшафта в формировании территориальной идентичности (на примере рабочих районов Москвы) // Культурный ландшафт: эволюции и революции воображения. Материалы Всероссийской междисциплинарной научной конференции с международным участием (Москва, 26–27 марта 2020 г.) / Под общ. ред.: Д.Н. Замятина, И. Г. Коноваловой. М.: Институт всеобщей истории РАН, 2020. С. 154-159.