Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Who Is to Blame? Content Analysis of Blogs about the Act of Terrorism at Domodedovo Airport. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 79–90. Гаврилов К.А., Толмач А.Д.Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Who Is to Blame? Content Analysis of Blogs about the Act of Terrorism at Domodedovo Airport. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 79–90.ISSN 1061-0154DOI: 10.1080/10610154.2016.1187016Размещена на сайте: 12.10.17 Поискать полный текст на Google AcademiaСсылка при цитировании:Гаврилов К.А., Толмач А.Д. Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Who Is to Blame? Content Analysis of Blogs about the Act of Terrorism at Domodedovo Airport. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 79–90. DOI: 10.1080/10610154.2016.1187016.Gavrilov K.A., Tolmach A.D. Who Is to Blame? Content Analysis of Blogs about the Act of Terrorism at Domodedovo Airport. Sociological Research. 2016. Vol. 55. No. 2. Pp. 79–90. DOI: 10.1080/10610154.2016.1187016.АннотацияWe present the results of a content analysis of communications related to the act of terrorism at Domodedovo airport. They show that mass media plays a significant role as a source of factual, undigested information. The theoretical value of the results is that they show a significant number of cases where an actor is accused with no reference to his actions or nonactions. The range of types of complicity in terrorist activity was substantial. We present the results of a content analysis of communications related tothe act of terrorism at Domodedovo airport. They show that mass mediaplays a significant role as a source of factual, undigested information.The theoretical value of the results is that they show a significant numberof cases where an actor is accused with no reference to his actionsor nonactions. The range of types of complicity in terrorist activity wassubstantial.Ключевые слова: attribution of responsibility and blame blogs perception of risk social media sociology of risk terrorism terrorist threat Рубрики: Социология риска и катастрофСоциология коммуникацийВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Gavrilov K. Who is to blame for the terrorist attack? Comparison of content analysis and survey data as sources of responsibility ascriptions // Journal of Risk Research. 2022. Vol. 25 (3). P. 285-302.Aigul Mavletova, Kirill Gavrilov & Tatiana Tholmogorova (2019) Gamifying a web survey among adolescents: effects on understanding of risk, risk calculation, and ratio-bias, Journal of Risk Research, 22:12, 1532-1545, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1501592Yanitsky O. Human Ecosystems in Critical Areas // Journal of Social Science Research, 2015, Vol. 9, No 3, December 17, pp. 1929-1935.Гаврилов К. А.От общества риска к метаморфозам мира: Памяти Ульриха Бека // Социологический ежегодник, 2015–2016: Сб. науч. тр. / РАН. ИНИОН. Центр социал. науч.-информ. исслед. Отд. социологии и социал. психологии; Кафедра общей социологии НИУ-ВШЭ; Ред. Н.Е. Покровский, Ред.-сост. Д.В. Ефременко. – Отв. ред.: О.А. Симонова, М.А. Ядова. – М., 2016. – (Сер.: Теория и история социологии). С. 317-330.Шлыкова Е. В.Особенности социальной адаптации в рискогенной среде в контексте социологии риска // Частное и общественное в повседневной жизни населения России: история и современность. материалы междунар. науч. конф.: в 2 т. / отв. ред. В.А. Веременко. – СПб.: ЛГУ им. А.С. Пушкина, 2018. – Т. 1. – 408 с. С. 264-270.