Yanitsky, O. N. (2017). In memoriam of Raymond Pahl Whose modern megalopolises? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16) 109-117. Yanitsky, O. N. (2017). In memoriam of Raymond Pahl Whose modern megalopolises? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16) 109-117.ISSN 2055-0286DOI: 10.14738/assrj.416.3602Размещена на сайте: 09.11.17Текст статьи на официальном сайте журнала URL: http://scholarpublishing.org/index.php/ASSRJ/article/view/3602/2031Ссылка при цитировании:Yanitsky, O. N. (2017). In memoriam of Raymond Pahl Whose modern megalopolises? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16) 109-117. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.416.3602.Yanitsky, O. N. (2017). In memoriam of Raymond Pahl Whose modern megalopolises? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(16) 109-117. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.416.3602.Авторы:Яницкий О.Н.АннотацияThe ‘whose city?’ question is acute today. The article is a brief inquiry in the meaning ofthis question posed by the UK sociologist R. Pahl in the early 1970s and to point out thechanges in urban studies during the last decade. His appeal for a cumulative, systematicapproach as well as for resistance against futuristically-oriented market research and adictate of the developers are still valid. A growing social inequality issue is today asimportant as half-a-century ago. Describing the ontological premises of the concept ofmodern megalopolises, the following structures and processes should be taken intoaccount: modern megalopolises are the sociobiotechnical systems (the SBT-systems)dependent on the global SBT-system which in turn tightly integrated by theinformation-communication technologies (IC-technologies); all kinds of them areinterconnected by socio-ecological metabolic processes; modern megacities areinvolved into global geopolitical processes aimed at gaining new resources andpolitical domination, and post-socialist megacities are involved in it; and the strugglebetween two adversarial trends – globalization/unification andlocalization/particularization—will continue. Therefore, there is no single ‘owner’ ofsuch megacities.Ключевые слова: geopolitics globalization ic-technologies megalopolis metabolism ownership sbt-systems virtual reality Рубрики: Социология риска и катастрофСоциология пространства и городаВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Yanitsky Oleg N. On Transition from the Second Industrial Revolution to the Fourth one. International Journal of Media, Journalism and Mass Communications (IJMJMC). Volume 3, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 1-10.Yanitsky, O.N. (2017). Current Globalization: A Challenge For The Humanities. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(12) 131-140.Oleg N. Yanitsky. Cyberspace of the Fourth Scientific and Technological Revolution. International Journal of Social Research, 2019; 3:24.Yanitsky O.N. Russian Megalopolis: Processes of Divergence, Separation and Integration of its Agents. International Journal of Political Science (IJPS), 2018, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 5-13.Яницкий О. Н.Yanitsky Oleg. Modern Wars: Are the Sociologists Well Prepared to Them? // Papers of Russian Sociologists for the 12th ESA Conference «Differences, Inequalities and Sociological Imagination» in Praque, the Czech Republic, August 25-28, 2015. Ed. by V.A. Mansurov. – Moscow: RSS, 2015.