Anikin, V. A. (2017) Occupational Propensity for Training in a Late Industrial Society: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Training and Development. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 249-284. Anikin, V. A. (2017) Occupational Propensity for Training in a Late Industrial Society: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Training and Development. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 249-284.ISSN 1468-2419DOI: 10.1111/ijtd.12106Размещена на сайте: 29.12.17Текст статьи URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317492495_Occupational_propensity_for_training_in_a_late_industrial_society_evidence_from_RussiaСсылка при цитировании:Anikin, V. A. (2017) Occupational Propensity for Training in a Late Industrial Society: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Training and Development. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 249-284. DOI: 10.1111/ijtd.12106.Anikin, V. A. (2017) Occupational Propensity for Training in a Late Industrial Society: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Training and Development. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 249-284. DOI: 10.1111/ijtd.12106.Авторы:Аникин В.А.АннотацияWhat factors best explain the low incidence of skills training in a late industrial society like Russia? This research undertakes a multilevel analysis of the role of occupational structure against the probability of training. The explanatory power of occupation-specific determinants and skills polarisation are evaluated, using a representative 2012 sample from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey. Applying a two-level Bayesian logistic regression model, we show that the incidence of training in Russia is significantly contextualised within the structure of occupations and the inequalities between them. The study shows that extremely high wage gaps within managerial class jobs can discourage training, an unusual finding. Markets accumulating interchangeable and disposable labour best explain the low incidence of training; workers within generic labour are less likely to develop their skills formally, except in urban markets. Although we did not find strong evidence of skills polarisation, Russians are yet to live in a knowledge economy.Ключевые слова: skills training human capital occupational structure generic labour multilevel modelling mcmc Рубрики: Социология образованияСоциальная структура и стратификацияВозможно, вам будут интересны другие публикации:Anikin, V. A. Training poverty in India: Reassessing the effect of social ascription. International Journal of Training and Development. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 277-300.Аникин В. А.Anikin V.A. Mode of Socio-Economic Development and Occupational Structure: The Case of Contemporary Russia // Transition Studies Review. 2013. Vol. 19. No. 4. P. 397-415.Аникин В. А.The Modernization Potential of the Professional Structure of the Employed Population of Russia // Sociological research. November-December 2012. Vol. 51. No. 6.Аникин В. А.Человеческий капитал - что это? // Аист на крыше. Демографический журнал. 2018. № 6. С. 2-5.Латова Н. В.Russian Workers through the Prism of Human Capital Theory // Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 49. No. 3. P. 24-41.